What is covid 'lab-leak' theory according to trump's new website?

In a significant shift in narrative, the White House’s newly revamped Covid-19 website has placed the controversial lab-leak theory at the forefront of its discussion on the origins of the virus. Previously a platform for public health information on vaccines and testing, the site now prominently features the claim that Covid-19 likely originated from a lab accident, specifically from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China.

This marks a departure from the widely accepted narrative that the virus emerged naturally from an animal-to-human spillover, an idea that has been supported by much of the scientific community.

One of the main components of the website is its criticism of the publication “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” a study often cited to discredit the lab-leak theory. The White House claims that Dr. Anthony Fauci, former President Joe Biden’s top medical advisor, pushed this narrative in order to promote the idea that Covid-19 had a natural origin. The publication, the site argues, was used by public health officials and the media to silence the lab-leak theory in favour of a more widely accepted natural origin.

The website outlines five key points that support the lab-leak theory:

• Unnatural Virus Characteristics: The virus allegedly has biological characteristics that are not typically found in nature, raising suspicions about its origins.
• Single Introduction: Data shows that all Covid-19 cases trace back to a single introduction into humans, contrasting with past pandemics where multiple spillover events occurred.
• Proximity to Wuhan Lab: The Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has conducted gain-of-function research (enhancing viruses for research), is located near the outbreak’s epicenter. The site points out that the lab has had issues with biosafety protocols, further raising concerns about a potential lab leak.
• Sick Researchers: Several WIV researchers showed symptoms similar to Covid-19 in late 2019, months before the virus was linked to a wet market in Wuhan, adding to suspicions that the virus was released from the lab.
• Absence of Natural Evidence: The website asserts that if there were evidence supporting a natural origin for Covid-19, it would have emerged by now. The lack of such evidence, according to the site, further strengthens the lab-leak theory.

Additionally, the website criticizes EcoHealth Alliance, which was involved in funding research at WIV. The organization allegedly used U.S. taxpayer money for dangerous gain-of-function research, with accusations that it violated the terms of its National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant. The U.S. Department of Justice has since opened an investigation into EcoHealth’s pandemic-era activities.

The revamped site also takes aim at public health measures such as mask mandates and social distancing, suggesting that these were arbitrary and lacked scientific backing. The site implies that these policies caused unnecessary harm to the economy and public well-being.

Perhaps most controversially, the website accuses the Biden administration of obstructing investigations into the lab-leak theory, allegedly suppressing evidence and stifling dissenting views on the pandemic’s origins. The White House claims that the administration colluded with social media platforms to censor alternative health narratives, including those questioning the natural origin of the virus.

As the debate over the virus’s origins intensifies, experts caution that the renewed focus on the lab-leak theory could undermine ongoing efforts to manage and mitigate Covid-19’s impact. While the theory remains a contentious issue, the White House’s decision to highlight it on the official website signals a significant shift in how the origins of the pandemic are being discussed at the highest levels of government.