Supreme Court has reiterated that proceedings initiated to review a judgment should not be confused with appeal proceedings. A bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and S V N Bhatti cautioned that courts ought not mix up review jurisdiction with appellate jurisdiction . It said that a review petition has a limited purpose and could not be permitted to function as an appeal in disguise .
"The review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and have to be strictly confined to the scope and ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC. Review is not to be confused with appellate powers, which may enable an appellate court to correct all manner of errors committed by the subordinate court. In exercise of the jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be reheard and corrected," the court said.
"The review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and have to be strictly confined to the scope and ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC. Review is not to be confused with appellate powers, which may enable an appellate court to correct all manner of errors committed by the subordinate court. In exercise of the jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be reheard and corrected," the court said.
You may also like
Home burnt, bullets rocked block: Benny Johnson remembers how Charlie Kirk sheltered his family - an unheard story
Constitution has stood test of time: SC
Since 1970, governors cleared 94% of over 17k bills, withheld assent to only 20: Centre
His thoughts inspire pursuit of building Viksit Bharat: PM Modi on Acharya Vinoba Bhave's birth anniversary
Oracle's Larry Ellison Becomes World's Richest Man, Elon Musk Slips To Second Place Due To Dip In Tesla Shares